Dutch investigators have determined that an ASL Airlines Ireland Boeing 737-400 freighter had been incorrectly loaded during a tight turnaround, before its crew experienced difficulty in rotation during the take-off roll.
The aircraft had arrived at Amsterdam from Dublin on 19 December 2023, carrying five empty cargo containers plus a 1.46t ballast block which had been placed in the aft position on the main freight deck.
This ballast block was supposed to remain in the aft location, and only the containers unloaded, because the aircraft was due to fly a connecting service to Brussels without cargo.
But the Dutch Safety Board states that the containers and the block were unloaded. When the block was returned to the aircraft it was placed in the cargo-door position.
“This misunderstanding could not be explained,” says the safety board. But it says loading was carried out with the support of electronic scanners and, since only two scanners were available, some of the six ground-handling staff might not have been familiar with the loading plan.
The turnaround time at Amsterdam was just 30min and there was pressure to meet the departure schedule.
According to the inquiry the cargo company’s supervisor handed the loading paperwork to the crew to sign, and signed it themselves, even though neither the supervisor nor the ground-handling staff had checked whether the jet was correctly loaded.
Under the carrier’s procedures, the crew did not have to check the loading, and only the captain was required to sign off the documents.
The first officer had been standing next to the ballast block at the time the cargo door was closed, but “didn’t realise it was in the wrong place”.
With the block located at the door, the aircraft’s centre-of-gravity shifted “significantly” further forward than the crew had expected.
The crew set the trim for a centre-of-gravity position of 10.6% mean aerodynamic chord, when the actual figure was -8.9%, substantially different from the forward limit of 7%. This shift equated to seven trim units prior to take-off.
Although the take-off roll from intersection E4 of runway 18L began normally, the first officer found the aircraft did not rotate as expected – despite near-maximum elevator input – when it reached the calculated rotation speed of 118kt.
The aircraft continued to accelerate until it started to rotate at 134kt, finally lifting off at 150kt.
Investigators point out that, while the available runway was reduced by the intersection departure, the jet was light from being nearly empty and only carrying fuel sufficient for the short flight to Brussels.
The safety board states that the first officer subsequently retrimmed the aircraft after which no further elevator control problems were encountered.
As a result of the incident, the freight company instructed employees to send loading and unloading plans to ground-handlers by email to prevent miscommunication. The carrier also reminded crews that the captain is ultimately responsible for ensuring correct loading, and stressed the need for checks on ballast block positions when flying lightly-loaded aircraft.
Dutch investigators have determined that an ASL Airlines Ireland Boeing 737-400 freighter had been incorrectly loaded during a tight turnaround, before its crew experienced difficulty in rotation during the take-off roll.
The aircraft had arrived at Amsterdam from Dublin on 19 December 2023, carrying five empty cargo containers plus a 1.46t ballast block which had been placed in the aft position on the main freight deck.
This ballast block was supposed to remain in the aft location, and only the containers unloaded, because the aircraft was due to fly a connecting service to Brussels without cargo.
But the Dutch Safety Board states that the containers and the block were unloaded. When the block was returned to the aircraft it was placed in the cargo-door position.
“This misunderstanding could not be explained,” says the safety board. But it says loading was carried out with the support of electronic scanners and, since only two scanners were available, some of the six ground-handling staff might not have been familiar with the loading plan.
The turnaround time at Amsterdam was just 30min and there was pressure to meet the departure schedule.
According to the inquiry the cargo company’s supervisor handed the loading paperwork to the crew to sign, and signed it themselves, even though neither the supervisor nor the ground-handling staff had checked whether the jet was correctly loaded.
Under the carrier’s procedures, the crew did not have to check the loading, and only the captain was required to sign off the documents.
The first officer had been standing next to the ballast block at the time the cargo door was closed, but “didn’t realise it was in the wrong place”.
With the block located at the door, the aircraft’s centre-of-gravity shifted “significantly” further forward than the crew had expected.
The crew set the trim for a centre-of-gravity position of 10.6% mean aerodynamic chord, when the actual figure was -8.9%, substantially different from the forward limit of 7%. This shift equated to seven trim units prior to take-off.
Although the take-off roll from intersection E4 of runway 18L began normally, the first officer found the aircraft did not rotate as expected – despite near-maximum elevator input – when it reached the calculated rotation speed of 118kt.
The aircraft continued to accelerate until it started to rotate at 134kt, finally lifting off at 150kt.
Investigators point out that, while the available runway was reduced by the intersection departure, the jet was light from being nearly empty and only carrying fuel sufficient for the short flight to Brussels.
The safety board states that the first officer subsequently retrimmed the aircraft after which no further elevator control problems were encountered.
As a result of the incident, the freight company instructed employees to send loading and unloading plans to ground-handlers by email to prevent miscommunication. The carrier also reminded crews that the captain is ultimately responsible for ensuring correct loading, and stressed the need for checks on ballast block positions when flying lightly-loaded aircraft.
Source link
Share This:
skylinesmecher
Plan the perfect NYC Memorial Day weekend
Pack only what you need and avoid overpacking to streamline the check-in and security screening…
LA’s worst traffic areas and how to avoid them
Consider using alternative routes, such as Sepulveda Boulevard, which runs parallel to the 405 in…
Leonardo AW249 Fenice attack helicopter on track for delivery to Italian army in 2027
Leonardo Helicopters remains confident it will deliver the first AW249 Fenice attack helicopter to the…
A320neo crew sought to save time with intersection departure before aborted taxiway take-off
Belgian investigators have disclosed that an SAS Airbus A320neo had accelerated to 127kt before aborting…
Royal Navy helicopters arrive to boost defence of UK’s Akrotiri base in Cyprus
The UK has bolstered its defensive capability in the eastern Mediterranean, with new rotary-wing assets…
Airbus deliveries continue to lag last year’s pace
Airbus delivered fewer aircraft over the first two months – a total of 54 –…
US airlines urge government action over Dublin airport passenger cap threat
A recent European court opinion has left US airlines urging their government take urgent action…
Pilatus announces certification approval for PC-7 MKX trainer
Pilatus has reported achieving initial certification for its PC-7 MKX basic trainer, after enjoying a…
Russian authorities scrutinise Azur Air operations after flight delays and disruption
Russian authorities are to conduct an unscheduled inspection of leisure carrier Azur Air after alleging…
UK Lockheed Martin F-35Bs down Iranian drones in defensive action over Jordanian territory
The UK has performed its first aerial engagements with the Lockheed Martin F-35B, with aircraft…
France’s Pan Europeenne firms commitment to Aura’s hybrid-electric ERA
French regional carrier Pan Europeenne Air Service has made a firm commitment to the Aura…
European Defence Agency picks Capa-X for multi-mission UAS assessment
The European Defence Agency (EDA) is to explore the potential of Airbus Helicopters’ Capa-X uncrewed…