Dutch investigators have determined that an ASL Airlines Ireland Boeing 737-400 freighter had been incorrectly loaded during a tight turnaround, before its crew experienced difficulty in rotation during the take-off roll.
The aircraft had arrived at Amsterdam from Dublin on 19 December 2023, carrying five empty cargo containers plus a 1.46t ballast block which had been placed in the aft position on the main freight deck.
This ballast block was supposed to remain in the aft location, and only the containers unloaded, because the aircraft was due to fly a connecting service to Brussels without cargo.
But the Dutch Safety Board states that the containers and the block were unloaded. When the block was returned to the aircraft it was placed in the cargo-door position.
“This misunderstanding could not be explained,” says the safety board. But it says loading was carried out with the support of electronic scanners and, since only two scanners were available, some of the six ground-handling staff might not have been familiar with the loading plan.
The turnaround time at Amsterdam was just 30min and there was pressure to meet the departure schedule.
According to the inquiry the cargo company’s supervisor handed the loading paperwork to the crew to sign, and signed it themselves, even though neither the supervisor nor the ground-handling staff had checked whether the jet was correctly loaded.
Under the carrier’s procedures, the crew did not have to check the loading, and only the captain was required to sign off the documents.
The first officer had been standing next to the ballast block at the time the cargo door was closed, but “didn’t realise it was in the wrong place”.
With the block located at the door, the aircraft’s centre-of-gravity shifted “significantly” further forward than the crew had expected.
The crew set the trim for a centre-of-gravity position of 10.6% mean aerodynamic chord, when the actual figure was -8.9%, substantially different from the forward limit of 7%. This shift equated to seven trim units prior to take-off.
Although the take-off roll from intersection E4 of runway 18L began normally, the first officer found the aircraft did not rotate as expected – despite near-maximum elevator input – when it reached the calculated rotation speed of 118kt.
The aircraft continued to accelerate until it started to rotate at 134kt, finally lifting off at 150kt.
Investigators point out that, while the available runway was reduced by the intersection departure, the jet was light from being nearly empty and only carrying fuel sufficient for the short flight to Brussels.
The safety board states that the first officer subsequently retrimmed the aircraft after which no further elevator control problems were encountered.
As a result of the incident, the freight company instructed employees to send loading and unloading plans to ground-handlers by email to prevent miscommunication. The carrier also reminded crews that the captain is ultimately responsible for ensuring correct loading, and stressed the need for checks on ballast block positions when flying lightly-loaded aircraft.
Dutch investigators have determined that an ASL Airlines Ireland Boeing 737-400 freighter had been incorrectly loaded during a tight turnaround, before its crew experienced difficulty in rotation during the take-off roll.
The aircraft had arrived at Amsterdam from Dublin on 19 December 2023, carrying five empty cargo containers plus a 1.46t ballast block which had been placed in the aft position on the main freight deck.
This ballast block was supposed to remain in the aft location, and only the containers unloaded, because the aircraft was due to fly a connecting service to Brussels without cargo.
But the Dutch Safety Board states that the containers and the block were unloaded. When the block was returned to the aircraft it was placed in the cargo-door position.
“This misunderstanding could not be explained,” says the safety board. But it says loading was carried out with the support of electronic scanners and, since only two scanners were available, some of the six ground-handling staff might not have been familiar with the loading plan.
The turnaround time at Amsterdam was just 30min and there was pressure to meet the departure schedule.
According to the inquiry the cargo company’s supervisor handed the loading paperwork to the crew to sign, and signed it themselves, even though neither the supervisor nor the ground-handling staff had checked whether the jet was correctly loaded.
Under the carrier’s procedures, the crew did not have to check the loading, and only the captain was required to sign off the documents.
The first officer had been standing next to the ballast block at the time the cargo door was closed, but “didn’t realise it was in the wrong place”.
With the block located at the door, the aircraft’s centre-of-gravity shifted “significantly” further forward than the crew had expected.
The crew set the trim for a centre-of-gravity position of 10.6% mean aerodynamic chord, when the actual figure was -8.9%, substantially different from the forward limit of 7%. This shift equated to seven trim units prior to take-off.
Although the take-off roll from intersection E4 of runway 18L began normally, the first officer found the aircraft did not rotate as expected – despite near-maximum elevator input – when it reached the calculated rotation speed of 118kt.
The aircraft continued to accelerate until it started to rotate at 134kt, finally lifting off at 150kt.
Investigators point out that, while the available runway was reduced by the intersection departure, the jet was light from being nearly empty and only carrying fuel sufficient for the short flight to Brussels.
The safety board states that the first officer subsequently retrimmed the aircraft after which no further elevator control problems were encountered.
As a result of the incident, the freight company instructed employees to send loading and unloading plans to ground-handlers by email to prevent miscommunication. The carrier also reminded crews that the captain is ultimately responsible for ensuring correct loading, and stressed the need for checks on ballast block positions when flying lightly-loaded aircraft.
Source link
Share This:
admin
Plan the perfect NYC Memorial Day weekend
Pack only what you need and avoid overpacking to streamline the check-in and security screening…
LA’s worst traffic areas and how to avoid them
Consider using alternative routes, such as Sepulveda Boulevard, which runs parallel to the 405 in…
Fully-substituted MC-21 prototype flown to Zhukovsky for certification tests
United Aircraft has flown the latest, fully import-substituted Yakovlev MC-21 prototype to the test centre…
Western sanctions could accelerate Russian fighter aircraft production decline – RUSI analysis
A new analysis argues that the West could meaningfully accelerate Russia’s decline as a producer…
How regime change in Syria affected our annual World Air Forces fleet review
Significant combat action that has taken place around the globe over the past 12 months…
Crew of 737 flew at low height to correct approach after pressure-setting error
Czech investigators have disclosed that a Boeing 737 crew levelled the aircraft at a low…
Embraer’s KC-390 completes tanker certification trials with Brazilian Saab Gripen E fighters
The Brazilian air force (FAB), Embraer and Saab have completed a certification flight-test campaign to…
Stood down: which types departed national fleets during our World Air Forces review?
We detail some of the most notable national fleet retirements recorded in the 12 months…
UK regional Blue Islands suspends operations weeks after Eastern Airways
Another UK regional operator, Blue Islands, has suspended operations barely two weeks after the demise…
SJ-100’s domestic engines tested for resilience to water ingestion
United Aircraft has carried out water-ingestion tests on its initial import-substituted Yakovlev SJ-100, equipped with…
Wizz A321XLR’s descent rate increased just before hard landing and tail-strike
Czech investigators have disclosed that a Wizz Air UK Airbus A321XLR’s descent rate increased by…
Aviation’s environmental action slow to take off, despite ‘unprecedented unity’
Such is the fundamental importance of aviation tackling its emissions that it has become commonplace…