Norwegian investigators have determined that weak altimeter procedures resulted in a Wideroe De Havilland Dash 8-300 crew’s forgetting to set and check the correct QNH pressure during an approach to Svolvaer airport.
The turboprop had been inbound from Bodo, in darkness, on 22 December 2022.
Once the aircraft began descending for the approach, its altimeter was still referencing the standard QNH pressure setting of 1013hPa rather than the local figure of 987hPa – which meant the Dash 8 was flying some 700ft below the altitude indicated to the pilots.
The ground-proximity warning system alerted the crew when the aircraft was 3.1nm from the threshold of runway 01, prompting the pilots to abort and return to Bodo.
Norwegian investigation authority SHK says the crew had originally been cleared to descend from 9,000ft to 4,000ft – a clearance which would normally have triggered the crew to set the correct altimeter reference pressure.
But this descent was delayed because the crew had to enter a holding pattern for 10min while snow was cleared from the runway. SHK says this delay could have led the pilots to forget the altimeter change.
When the runway re-opened, the captain, who was flying, decided – “without discussing the matter” with the first officer – that they would conduct a localiser approach, rather than a satellite-based one, even though this involved a higher workload.
SHK says the first officer was “not sufficiently included” in the decision-making process, including the choice of approach and the start of the descent, and it believes this was a “contributing factor” to the crew’s forgetting to set the local QNH on the altimeter.
“Local QNH is normally set as descent towards the first altitude begins,” it states. “Since this is the trigger for performing the approach checklist, that too was forgotten.”
While the checklists and procedures used by Wideroe to set the correct QNH were considered to be individual barriers, SHK points out that they had “dependencies” which made them “less efficient”.
Under normal circumstances the local QNH would be set once, and checked three times before landing. But the heavy workload created by the choice of a localiser approach probably contributed to a failure to complete procedures.
The approach was conducted in darkness and instrument conditions, and an aural ‘500ft’ alert sounded in the cockpit.
“At this point, the [first officer] began to feel that there was something wrong,” says SHK. Shortly afterwards, the ground-proximity warning system sounded at 324ft and issued a ‘pull up’ instruction.
The crew’s prompt reaction meant the Dash 8 lost only 10ft of height and it was climbing within 6s of the warning.
After realising the QNH setting error, and the gravity of the incident, the crew opted not to attempt a second approach and instead returned to Bodo. They relieved themselves from duty and ensured the flight-recorder data was preserved.
None of the 29 passengers and three crew members was injured.
Norwegian investigators have determined that weak altimeter procedures resulted in a Wideroe De Havilland Dash 8-300 crew’s forgetting to set and check the correct QNH pressure during an approach to Svolvaer airport.
The turboprop had been inbound from Bodo, in darkness, on 22 December 2022.
Once the aircraft began descending for the approach, its altimeter was still referencing the standard QNH pressure setting of 1013hPa rather than the local figure of 987hPa – which meant the Dash 8 was flying some 700ft below the altitude indicated to the pilots.
The ground-proximity warning system alerted the crew when the aircraft was 3.1nm from the threshold of runway 01, prompting the pilots to abort and return to Bodo.
Norwegian investigation authority SHK says the crew had originally been cleared to descend from 9,000ft to 4,000ft – a clearance which would normally have triggered the crew to set the correct altimeter reference pressure.
But this descent was delayed because the crew had to enter a holding pattern for 10min while snow was cleared from the runway. SHK says this delay could have led the pilots to forget the altimeter change.
When the runway re-opened, the captain, who was flying, decided – “without discussing the matter” with the first officer – that they would conduct a localiser approach, rather than a satellite-based one, even though this involved a higher workload.
SHK says the first officer was “not sufficiently included” in the decision-making process, including the choice of approach and the start of the descent, and it believes this was a “contributing factor” to the crew’s forgetting to set the local QNH on the altimeter.
“Local QNH is normally set as descent towards the first altitude begins,” it states. “Since this is the trigger for performing the approach checklist, that too was forgotten.”
While the checklists and procedures used by Wideroe to set the correct QNH were considered to be individual barriers, SHK points out that they had “dependencies” which made them “less efficient”.
Under normal circumstances the local QNH would be set once, and checked three times before landing. But the heavy workload created by the choice of a localiser approach probably contributed to a failure to complete procedures.
The approach was conducted in darkness and instrument conditions, and an aural ‘500ft’ alert sounded in the cockpit.
“At this point, the [first officer] began to feel that there was something wrong,” says SHK. Shortly afterwards, the ground-proximity warning system sounded at 324ft and issued a ‘pull up’ instruction.
The crew’s prompt reaction meant the Dash 8 lost only 10ft of height and it was climbing within 6s of the warning.
After realising the QNH setting error, and the gravity of the incident, the crew opted not to attempt a second approach and instead returned to Bodo. They relieved themselves from duty and ensured the flight-recorder data was preserved.
None of the 29 passengers and three crew members was injured.
Source link
Share This:
admin
Plan the perfect NYC Memorial Day weekend
Pack only what you need and avoid overpacking to streamline the check-in and security screening…
LA’s worst traffic areas and how to avoid them
Consider using alternative routes, such as Sepulveda Boulevard, which runs parallel to the 405 in…
Safran tasks new UK centre with electric and composite research for future single-aisle
French aerospace firm Safran is internationalising its technology research operation by setting up a centre…
Leonardo Helicopters’ Proteus technology demonstrator poised to make first flight for UK Royal Navy
Leonardo Helicopters has edged a step closer to flying its AW09-based Proteus technology demonstrator for…
Brazil test fires MBDA Meteor missiles from Gripen E fighter in major milestone
Brazil has notched a major milestone in its campaign to phase in Saab’s latest Gripen…
Aeroflot Group discloses acquisition of 747 and 737 freighters
Aeroflot Group has disclosed that eight aircraft – including freighters – have been introduced to…
Airbus cuts full-year delivery target by 30 aircraft
Airbus has cut its full-year delivery target to 790 commercial aircraft, down from the original…
Hi Fly claims Antarctic first with A330 follow-up to A340 landing
Portuguese wet-lease specialist Hi Fly has flown an Airbus A330-300 to Antarctica, claiming a first…
Austria to field 12-strong Leonardo M-346FA fleet from 2028 under $1.75 billion deal
Austria has finalised a roughly €1.5 billion ($1.75 billion) deal that will lead to its…
Avincis and DHC partner on CL-series waterbomber support
Aerial services provider Avincis is to collaborate with De Havilland Canada (DHC) on a series…
MBDA Meteor missile integration nears flight-test phase with Lockheed Martin’s stealthy F-35A
MBDA’s Meteor beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile has moved a step closer to commencing flight trials with…
Jekta hydrogen-electric amphibian aircraft scale model testing begins January 2024
Swiss start-up Jekta plans next month to begin flight testing a scale model of the…