Norwegian investigators have determined that weak altimeter procedures resulted in a Wideroe De Havilland Dash 8-300 crew’s forgetting to set and check the correct QNH pressure during an approach to Svolvaer airport.
The turboprop had been inbound from Bodo, in darkness, on 22 December 2022.
Once the aircraft began descending for the approach, its altimeter was still referencing the standard QNH pressure setting of 1013hPa rather than the local figure of 987hPa – which meant the Dash 8 was flying some 700ft below the altitude indicated to the pilots.
The ground-proximity warning system alerted the crew when the aircraft was 3.1nm from the threshold of runway 01, prompting the pilots to abort and return to Bodo.
Norwegian investigation authority SHK says the crew had originally been cleared to descend from 9,000ft to 4,000ft – a clearance which would normally have triggered the crew to set the correct altimeter reference pressure.
But this descent was delayed because the crew had to enter a holding pattern for 10min while snow was cleared from the runway. SHK says this delay could have led the pilots to forget the altimeter change.
When the runway re-opened, the captain, who was flying, decided – “without discussing the matter” with the first officer – that they would conduct a localiser approach, rather than a satellite-based one, even though this involved a higher workload.
SHK says the first officer was “not sufficiently included” in the decision-making process, including the choice of approach and the start of the descent, and it believes this was a “contributing factor” to the crew’s forgetting to set the local QNH on the altimeter.
“Local QNH is normally set as descent towards the first altitude begins,” it states. “Since this is the trigger for performing the approach checklist, that too was forgotten.”
While the checklists and procedures used by Wideroe to set the correct QNH were considered to be individual barriers, SHK points out that they had “dependencies” which made them “less efficient”.
Under normal circumstances the local QNH would be set once, and checked three times before landing. But the heavy workload created by the choice of a localiser approach probably contributed to a failure to complete procedures.
The approach was conducted in darkness and instrument conditions, and an aural ‘500ft’ alert sounded in the cockpit.
“At this point, the [first officer] began to feel that there was something wrong,” says SHK. Shortly afterwards, the ground-proximity warning system sounded at 324ft and issued a ‘pull up’ instruction.
The crew’s prompt reaction meant the Dash 8 lost only 10ft of height and it was climbing within 6s of the warning.
After realising the QNH setting error, and the gravity of the incident, the crew opted not to attempt a second approach and instead returned to Bodo. They relieved themselves from duty and ensured the flight-recorder data was preserved.
None of the 29 passengers and three crew members was injured.
Norwegian investigators have determined that weak altimeter procedures resulted in a Wideroe De Havilland Dash 8-300 crew’s forgetting to set and check the correct QNH pressure during an approach to Svolvaer airport.
The turboprop had been inbound from Bodo, in darkness, on 22 December 2022.
Once the aircraft began descending for the approach, its altimeter was still referencing the standard QNH pressure setting of 1013hPa rather than the local figure of 987hPa – which meant the Dash 8 was flying some 700ft below the altitude indicated to the pilots.
The ground-proximity warning system alerted the crew when the aircraft was 3.1nm from the threshold of runway 01, prompting the pilots to abort and return to Bodo.
Norwegian investigation authority SHK says the crew had originally been cleared to descend from 9,000ft to 4,000ft – a clearance which would normally have triggered the crew to set the correct altimeter reference pressure.
But this descent was delayed because the crew had to enter a holding pattern for 10min while snow was cleared from the runway. SHK says this delay could have led the pilots to forget the altimeter change.
When the runway re-opened, the captain, who was flying, decided – “without discussing the matter” with the first officer – that they would conduct a localiser approach, rather than a satellite-based one, even though this involved a higher workload.
SHK says the first officer was “not sufficiently included” in the decision-making process, including the choice of approach and the start of the descent, and it believes this was a “contributing factor” to the crew’s forgetting to set the local QNH on the altimeter.
“Local QNH is normally set as descent towards the first altitude begins,” it states. “Since this is the trigger for performing the approach checklist, that too was forgotten.”
While the checklists and procedures used by Wideroe to set the correct QNH were considered to be individual barriers, SHK points out that they had “dependencies” which made them “less efficient”.
Under normal circumstances the local QNH would be set once, and checked three times before landing. But the heavy workload created by the choice of a localiser approach probably contributed to a failure to complete procedures.
The approach was conducted in darkness and instrument conditions, and an aural ‘500ft’ alert sounded in the cockpit.
“At this point, the [first officer] began to feel that there was something wrong,” says SHK. Shortly afterwards, the ground-proximity warning system sounded at 324ft and issued a ‘pull up’ instruction.
The crew’s prompt reaction meant the Dash 8 lost only 10ft of height and it was climbing within 6s of the warning.
After realising the QNH setting error, and the gravity of the incident, the crew opted not to attempt a second approach and instead returned to Bodo. They relieved themselves from duty and ensured the flight-recorder data was preserved.
None of the 29 passengers and three crew members was injured.
Source link
Share This:
admin
Plan the perfect NYC Memorial Day weekend
Pack only what you need and avoid overpacking to streamline the check-in and security screening…
LA’s worst traffic areas and how to avoid them
Consider using alternative routes, such as Sepulveda Boulevard, which runs parallel to the 405 in…
Ukraine exploring purchase of Bell AH-1Z attack and UH-1Y utility helicopters
Ukraine has signed a letter of intent with rotorcraft manufacturer Bell exploring the purchase of…
Italy plans to restore lapsed maritime patrol capability with six-aircraft buy
Italy has outlined plans to acquire six new maritime patrol aircraft capable of performing anti-submarine…
Stockholm Arlanda takes advantage of ‘EoR’ concept to increase parallel approach efficiency
Stockholm Arlanda is claiming to be the first European airport to introduce a concept intended…
Norway presses ahead with defence helicopter acquisitions, as talks continue with UK on ASW assets
Norway continues to analyse the options for a future anti-submarine warfare (ASW) helicopter to equip…
Airbus Helicopters open to H225 Super Puma’s return for oil and gas operations
Airbus Helicopters is seeing renewed interest in its H225 Super Puma for offshore operations, almost…
Baykar’s Kizilelma UCAV soars through Aselsan AESA radar integration and weapons testing
Baykar Technologies’ Kizilelma unmanned combat air vehicle has been flown for the first time with…
First two Saab Gripen E fighters arrive for Swedish air force service at Satenas base
The Swedish air force has fielded its first Saab Gripen E fighters, with the new…
EASA foresees sufficient production capacity to meet EU’s 2030 sustainable fuel target
Sustainable aviation fuel in the European Union only accounted for 0.6% of the total uplift…
Regional aircraft lessor TrueNoord to advise Elysian on development of battery-powered E9X
Netherlands-based Elysian Aircraft is to collaborate with regional aircraft lessor TrueNoord on the development of…
Ukrainian air force could acquire up to 150 Saab Gripen E fighters from 2026 via pact with Sweden
Ukraine has announced its interest in making a possible major acquisition of Saab Gripen E…